Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 143(11): 2183-2188, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28710714

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow of endometrial carcinoma patients has been demonstrated previously. In contrast to breast cancer, no prognostic significance or association with clinicopathological features was revealed for endometrial carcinoma so far. The aim of this study was to investigate DTC in a large patient cohort with in-depth pathology review data available and to study DTC occurrence in the context of L1CAM and long-term disease specific follow-up. METHODS: Patients treated for endometrial carcinoma at the Tuebingen University Women's hospital between 2003 and 2013 were identified. Cases with previous expert central pathology review including L1CAM immunohistochemistry and bone marrow aspirates available were selected. The presence of DTC and L1CAM expression was studied immunohistochemically. RESULTS: In 395 cases with a confirmed diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma, bone marrow aspirates were available. DTC were detected in 17.2%. The presence of DTC was independent from tumor histology, grade, lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI), FIGO stage, myoinvasion, L1CAM immunoreactivity, and nodal metastasis. DTC occurred less frequently in cases with a microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern of invasion (2.2 vs. 21.8%, p = 0.0003). Disease progression was distributed equally among patients with and without DTC present. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to confirm previous findings of DTC presence in a large well-characterized cohort of endometrial carcinoma patients. DTC are detectable in almost one-fifth of endometrial carcinoma and occur less frequently with a MELF pattern of invasion. Further studies investigating the role of DTC in endometrial carcinoma are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Médula Ósea/inmunología , Médula Ósea/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/inmunología , Neoplasias Endometriales/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/inmunología , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 143(2): 255-262, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27695947

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Low- and intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas have an excellent prognosis. Nonetheless, a small subgroup of such patients will experience unexpected relapse. Recently L1CAM was suggested to be a strong prognosticator in endometrial carcinoma. The focus of our study was on low- and intermediate-risk disease, where no or only limited adjuvant treatment is recommended according to current guidelines. METHODS: Endometrial carcinomas of low, intermediate and high-intermediate risk according to published 2016 consensus guidelines were identified. The study was limited to cases with previous central pathology review focusing on histotype, depth of myometrial invasion, presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and MELF pattern of invasion. Standard L1CAM immunohistochemistry was performed. Disease-specific uni- and multivariate survival analyses were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 344 cases were available for immunohistochemistry (low-risk: n = 250; intermediate-risk: n = 67; high-intermediate-risk: n = 27). L1CAM positivity rates were: 29/344 (8.4 %; all cases), 18/250 (7.2 %; low-risk), 6/67 (9.0 %; intermediate-risk) and 5/27 (18.5 %; high-intermediate-risk). Expression of L1CAM was independent of LVSI and MELF. L1CAM was a significant independent prognosticator for disease-specific survival with a hazard ratio of 5.98 [CI 1.50-22.14, p = 0.012]. Adverse prognostic significance of L1CAM positivity was maintained after low-risk subgroup analysis (5-year disease-specific survival rates 71.8 vs. 100 %, p < 0.0001). All four tumour-related deaths in the subgroup of low-risk disease occurred in patients with L1CAM-positive tumours. CONCLUSION: The current definition of "low-risk" in endometrial carcinoma should be amended. "Low-risk carcinomas" should be limited to L1CAM-negative tumours. L1CAM status will play a key role in future algorithms to tailor adjuvant treatment and patient follow-up strategies.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma Endometrioide/metabolismo , Neoplasias Endometriales/metabolismo , Molécula L1 de Adhesión de Célula Nerviosa/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Endometrioide/mortalidad , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...